04.28.10THUNDERTOME: ROUND 12SURVIVOR: let the great world spin (colum mccann)*
CHALLENGER: saving graces (elizabeth edwards)
i was about a hundred pages into elizabeth edwards's
saving graces (the 2006 post-cancer, pre-scandal memoir; i haven't read
resilience, the one she released last year) when i decided i prefer it to both bill clinton's
my life (2004), which reads like a bibliography and a fever dream, and hillary's
living history (2003), which was lucid, well-mannered, and kind of boring. edwards is well read (she has a BA in english and did three years of graduate work in american lit before going to law school) and a fine storyteller; her account of a childhood spent following her father (a navy pilot) around the world is actually my favorite part of the book. The Early Years, generally a vestigial bit of memoir, are actually rather muscular in elizabeth's story. i actually bristled a bit when she mentioned john for the first time ("John Edwards? He was a textiles major from a small town, wasn't he? And wasn't he the one who had had a date to a football game with a majorette?"); i was sorry to have gotten to the end of the japan stories, for one thing, and i wasn't especially anxious to hear about her eventually faithless husband, for another. that's the stuff of
resilience, though; this is the memoir about losing a child and fighting cancer.
...so hey (cough), let's have a book throwdown between
9/11 literature and dealing with grief and breast cancer! super-classy, no? i'm not too squeamish to say that i think edwards's chapters on losing her son, wade, are both extremely moving and just a bit unwieldy. she reproduces a number of her posts to
alt.support.grief (a usenet support group) after wade's death in a 1996 auto accident; they're quite moving, but they're intended for a very specific group of people (for individual people, in some cases). her narrative would benefit from some pruning there, i think, but i sympathize with both her and her editor; would
you like to tell a grieving mother to wrap it up? it hurts to think of how many hours edwards has spent at north carolina's oakwood cemetery literally tending graves; grief like that is unimaginable to me, and she deserves a lot of credit for making it public.
It doesn't matter to me whether all this sounds odd. I did it because it made it easier for me, easier for me to think that there were mothers who would come after me and tend to Wade's grave when I no longer could. Easier to think that we were all in this together, that we formed a bond, a community--these long-dead mothers and I, and the mothers who would come later--and the creed to which we all subscribed was the sanctity of the graves of our children.
i had a similar reaction to edwards's lengthy mentions of those who wrote to her after she announced that she had been diagnosed with breast cancer - and, similarly, i'm letting it go. she received
sixty-five thousand messages, you guys, and is responding to every single one.
I started on a more sensible regimen of signing, but it was slow, and I was embarrassed that we had printed out all the letters with the same date, in the beginning of February [2005], and then it became April and then May, and I was still writing notes on the bottom of letters dated February 7th. Finally my hand gave out, after about fifteen thousand responses. It was not too long after the surgery [to have lymph nodes removed] when I developed lymphedema, for which I was supposed to avoid repetitive motions--and I had to stop altogether for a time. The only upside was that I didn't worry any longer about that February date. Now I have started again, despite the lymphedema, despite some neuropathy that has dulled the nerves in my right hand, and I will write--as slowly as I need to--for as long as it takes.
as those thousands of messages suggest, elizabeth edwards's story resonates with a hell of a lot of people; her memoir is about "finding solace and strength from friends and strangers," per the subtitle, and it would be ridiculous to quibble about the length at which she describes her processes. surely someone who's lost so much (i don't think i want to read
resilience; seriously, universe?
more for this woman?) has earned the right to curate her life as she likes.
VICTOR: call it a courtly, bloodless win for
let the great world spin.
imaginary reading group discussion questions
01 have you read either of the clintons' memoirs? what did you think? which did you prefer, if you've read both?
02 if you were to edit an emotional memoir, do you think you'd be able to tell your author to tighten things up?
03 how did you feel about john edwards prior to the news of his infidelity?
04 should i have excused saving graces from THUNDERTOME?
*previous battle here.